This entry serves as a formal experiment, a juxtaposition of two 'themes' in order to discuss a recurrent development in various histories: Romanticism. Established forms eventually run out of material, wherein artists must find ways to create new material. Unlike the Baroque, which relishes the complications within a system to produce delightful developments, the Romantic reconstructs the preceding system through studied understanding and reapplication towards something bigger than itself.
Hector Berlioz's 1830 Symphonie fantastique famously formalizes program music: the literary augmentation of an otherwise aural tradition. In the piece, Berlioz tells the personal tale of an artist who, amidst the torments of love, falls into a deep opium stupor.1 His hallucinations, plagued by sightings of his amorous fixation, provide the basis of the musical experience. To elucidate this story, Berlioz wrote and rewrote an accompanying program to tell the tale the music could not on its own. After all, Berlioz composed a symphony, not an opera. Although it stands as solely a symphony, its artistic intention remains incomplete without its crucial narrative background. This opposition — between its Classical form and Modern program — point to its historic success and its contemporaneous uproar. Once its new way of thinking became understood, however, composers emulated it, and audiences learned how to appreciate it.
Similarly, in the early 1960s Boston underwent a major urban redevelopment effort that included a competition for a new city hall. As part of a grander vision of change, the building needed to be a monument for civic progress: radical and reverent. Entrants received complete specifications of the building's programmatic necessities, and finalists produced drawing sets more akin to construction documents than a proposal in order to keep the meddlesome hands of bureaucracy at bay. Kallmann McKinnell & Knowles won the competition with their floating concrete courtyard building. Architects and some Bostonians have declared it a masterpiece while others have derided it as a monstrosity.2 Boston City Hall takes the vocabulary of the Modern Movement and classifies it to create elements of style; it brings Modern forms into a Classical composition.
At the time of Symphonie fantastique's debut, the symphony had long established itself as a musical form.3 Parisian concert-goers at Berlioz's fantastical premiere were not only confronted with a novel text accompaniment, but were faced with atypical structures over five movements.5 The first movement perverts the typical two-themed approach in favor of an idée fixe. This motif — a representation of the love whom the artist laments — develops from a first theme into the whole first movement, and glimpses of it recur across the otherwise independent later movements. Within the expanded structure of the Classical symphony, Berlioz finds room to tell a story that the form had never told before: a deeply personal tale that goes beyond the music itself. Its lax classicality permits it to remain organized and understood despite its early incarnation of orchestrated individualism.
Brutalism derives from the French béton brut: raw concrete. The building's brutality emerges not from oppression; it traverses brutality to express its heroic undertaking. Brutalism desires to leaven Modernism's free facade with raw material and Romantic individuality, to convey its complexities through a limited but legible vocabulary.6 Unlike the industrial aspirations of, for example, Le Corbusier, whose architectures used free form as an open vessel for any number of contents, Boston City Hall's specific interiors dictate the cast facade. Rather tha accept all programs with a universal vocabulary, Kallmann McKinnell & Knowles assemble a bespoke structure with an ornate set of programmed blocks. Elongated dentils march across stacked entablatures to spell out the monotonous civic office space they contain.A Large blocks of various shapes protrude from the rhythmically restrained mass to announce the mayor's office, legislative assembly hall and other programmatic anomalies. Despite its irregularity, Boston City Hall balances into a monolithic entity through its structured systems.
Where Symphonie fantastique expands into virgin domains to generate new beyond the old, Boston City Hall returns to abandoned classical grounds to make the 'new' no longer old. The heroic Boston City Hall formalizes the renegade thoughts of an aging Modern Movement with the steadied hand of the classical. As Berlioz strove to humanize the order of the Classical era, Boston City Hall wishes to humanize the new order of the Modern Movement. A practiced hand drew through each intersection of program to create the formal perturbations of City Hall — all so that it could be cast in concrete with proportion, order and style.C Each move made, however complex its end result, stems from basic forms. The overall structure — an inverted building suspended in the air — forbids any direct comparison to ancient typologies, but amalgamations of their imprints appear: a Greek colonnade here, an Aztec-cum-Art-Deco geometry there. The building maintains a modern trajectory in its monolithic structure and lack of superficial ornamentation, but its ordered approach and stylistic elements revert to classical structuring. New ideas return to old methods, romanticize them and progress. Berlioz found novelty by keeping old methods to convey new romantic fixations. Both return from a pendular peak with zeal. Assured of a functional system, Berlioz and Brutalism push boundaries to begin the recreation of the system. For Kallmann McKinnell & Knowles, classical methods had become so disused their reintroduction proved novel within the new systems of the 20th century. Without dismissing the notion that form follows function, Boston City Hall recalls the significance and signification of Neoclassical architectures in its composed construction. Kallmann McKinnell & Knowles presaged the full reversion, but as with Berlioz's program towards a more modern (but not quite Modern), non-Classical music, such transitions take time — though it does seem like less every time it gets closer. This Romantic whimsy, like all romances, lets audiences enjoy the moment for what it is.
Programming diluted the purity of classical music. Over the course of the 19th century, classical music would discover new forms through the creation of scenes in sound alone. Modest Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition and Camille Saint-Saëns' The Carnival of the Animals go beyond Berlioz's programmatic footsteps by abandoning the symphonic structure in favor of forms attuned to the tale. Finally, the program becomes music when the 20th century presents Arnold Schoenberg. Berlioz used text to reflect the sentiments of his symphony; Schoenberg writes a set of rules. His twelve-tone system derives music entirely from a prewritten text. Music transitions from being programmed (given meaning) to being programmed (derived algorithmically). The embellished, composed structures of the Classical era are long gone; the Modern Movement creates new, rational structures.
Brutalism uses styled structure not as a 'design crutch' (as 19th-century eclectics stand accused), but as an organizational tool used to create legible monuments. Classical structures exist to resolve common issues; they are functions. By returning to this long-shunned order, Boston City Hall — though its lack of embellishments resemble the industrial aesthetic of the Modern Movement — aspires to Acropolis-esque monumentality. This restitution of classical structuring marks an evolution, a progression through retrogression, a combination of traditional and modern. The end product declares legibility and restraint alongside starkness and monomania.D On the eve of Postmodernism, Boston City Hall presages the curation of influences that will define the next generation. In itself, it elaborates a small portion of a much larger shift.
# Date [Return to] Title
500+ Ongoing Essays
550 May 2023 Platform Gamification
504 December 2022 On the Grid
518 December 2022 A Suspended Moment
A–Z Ongoing Glossary
G September 2022 – as in Girder
F May 2022 – as in Formal
* April 2022 – Key
E February 2022 – as in Entablature
D November 2021 – as in Duck
C August 2021 – as in Czarchitect
B June 2021 – as in Balustrade
A April 2021 – as in Aalto
0–15 December 2020 Journal
15 November 2020 Practice (in Theory)
14 October 2020 Alternative Narratives beyond Angkor
13 September 2020 Urban Preservation in Cuba
12e August 2020 Conversation on Copley Square: Summations
12d July 2020 Conversation on Copley Square: Conceptions
12c June 2020 Conversation on Copley Square: Reflections
12b June 2020 Conversation on Copley Square: Nonfictions
12a May 2020 Conversation on Copley Square: Foundations
11 May 2020 Out of OFFICE
10 March 2020 Hudson Yards from the High Line
9 March 2020 Metastructures
8 February 2020 Form, Program and Movements
7 February 2020 Life in the Ruins of Ruins
6 January 2020 The Urban Improvise
5 January 2020 Having Learned from Las Vegas, or Moving past Macau
4 December 2019 A Retrospective on the Decade's Spaces
3 December 2019 The Captive Global City
2 November 2019 Temporal Layers in Archaeological Space
1 November 2019 Contemporary Art Museums as Sculptures in the Field
0 Undated Manifesto: A Loose Architecture
© 2019 – 2023 Win Overholser
Comments
Loading comments...
Powered by HTML Comment Box.